CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L
CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while FEPG.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. CSH2.L is passively managed, while FEPG.L is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSH2.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.
Performance
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -3.31% return.
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 2.24% | 1.93% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.31% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH2.L and FEPG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSH2.L
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSH2.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 174.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum FEPG.L drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH2.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -37.25% | +36.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.93% | +28.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -21.44% | +21.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH2.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 46.70% | -46.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 46.70% | -46.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 46.70% | -46.26% |
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH2.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSH2.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH2.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.
CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while FEPG.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH2.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer