PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH2.L vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while CSWC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSWC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than CSWC's 14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed CSWC with an annualized return of 2.10%, while CSWC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.


CSH2.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.32%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.10%

CSWC

1D
1.28%
1M
4.07%
YTD
14.23%
6M
15.92%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
2.01%4.67%5.61%4.72%1.54%0.13%0.30%0.82%0.70%0.42%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
14.23%6.14%3.93%48.29%-15.67%58.89%-4.45%18.13%37.20%0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH2.L and CSWC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH2.L vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH2.LCSWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+13.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.73

1.24

+3.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.75

1.66

+26.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

163.55

5.58

+157.97

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.32, which is higher than the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH2.L and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum CSWC drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH2.LCSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-58.68%

+58.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-15.01%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-27.36%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

-27.36%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.37%

-58.68%

+58.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-12.82%

+12.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

4.47%

-4.44%

Volatility

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) is 0.06%, while Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH2.LCSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

4.31%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

14.06%

-13.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

18.74%

-18.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.56%

22.51%

-21.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

27.34%

-26.90%

Dividends

CSH2.L vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
10.89%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH2.L and CSWC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer