CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L
CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi, while ANRJ.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. CSH2.L is actively managed, while ANRJ.L is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L returned 2.07%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for ANRJ.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CSH2.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.
Performance
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than ANRJ.L's 27.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 2.07%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 28.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 1.74% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 27.53% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | -27.94% | 3.65% | 0.61% | 9.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH2.L and ANRJ.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2015 | -0.03 |
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Communication Services
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Healthcare
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Financial Services
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Industrials
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Consumer Defensive
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Energy
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Utilities
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Basic Materials
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
Real Estate
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSH2.L
ANRJ.L
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSH2.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.37 | 1.66 | +2.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.66 | 8.15 | +19.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 159.04 | 26.14 | +132.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSH2.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05 | 4.01 | +4.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 6.49 | 1.36 | +5.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 4.68 | 0.66 | +4.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.62 | 0.49 | +4.13 |
Drawdowns
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum ANRJ.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and ANRJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH2.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -57.08% | +56.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.16% | -8.08% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | -13.17% | +12.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.29% | -19.81% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.37% | -57.08% | +56.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.59% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -11.86% | +11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 2.53% | -2.50% |
Volatility
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) is 0.08%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH2.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 6.93% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.25% | 13.53% | -13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 16.43% | -15.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 21.21% | -20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 24.69% | -24.25% |
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH2.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSH2.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSH2.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH2.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSH2.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and ANRJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer