PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).

CSH.PA and LQQ.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSH.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2007. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. Both CSH.PA and LQQ.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc		0.45%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.65%1.93%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage		-10.77%14.16%57.02%112.33%-59.20%71.22%74.17%83.28%-3.57%48.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than LQQ.PA's -10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has underperformed LQQ.PA with an annualized return of 0.88%, while LQQ.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 29.73% annualized return.

CSH.PA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.45%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
0.88%

LQQ.PA

1D
5.92%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-10.77%
6M
-7.37%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
34.50%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
29.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc

Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage

Often compared with CSH.PA:
CSH.PA vs. CLOA.DECSH.PA vs. XEON.DECSH.PA vs. SWVXXCSH.PA vs. SP5.PACSH.PA vs. PAEEM.PACSH.PA vs. PSP5.PACSH.PA vs. PE500.PA
Often compared with LQQ.PA:
LQQ.PA vs. QQQ3.LLQQ.PA vs. QLDLQQ.PA vs. PUST.PALQQ.PA vs. QDVE.DELQQ.PA vs. NASL.LLQQ.PA vs. EQQQ.LLQQ.PA vs. SPY

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.

LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA
LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSH.PALQQ.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.80

0.77

+3.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.25

1.27

+4.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.18

+0.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.82

2.70

+9.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

64.78

8.75

+56.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and LQQ.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSH.PALQQ.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

0.77

+3.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.13

0.41

+4.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.35

0.75

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.63

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and LQQ.PA is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and LQQ.PA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CSH.PALQQ.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-75.86%

+72.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-24.34%

+24.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.87%

-61.21%

+60.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.34%

-61.21%

+58.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-17.00%

+16.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-15.84%

+14.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

6.75%

-6.72%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.29%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CSH.PALQQ.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

10.87%

-10.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

23.30%

-22.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

39.22%

-38.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

39.75%

-39.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.64%

38.80%

-38.16%