PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than WTI2.DE's 45.26% return.


CSH.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
6M
0.94%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
0.66%

WTI2.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
3.30%
YTD
45.26%
6M
46.87%
1Y
74.12%
3Y*
30.03%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.87%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.11%-0.70%-0.69%-0.61%-0.05%
WTI2.DE
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
45.26%9.72%18.67%52.35%-38.83%26.63%57.60%32.64%-8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and WTI2.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

WTI2.DE
WTI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH.PAWTI2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.41

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.93

4.89

+6.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.56

15.20

+40.36

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is higher than the WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and WTI2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum WTI2.DE drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and WTI2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH.PAWTI2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-40.18%

+35.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-15.08%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-35.27%

+35.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.80%

-40.18%

+39.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-3.93%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-11.15%

+9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

4.86%

-4.83%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTI2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH.PAWTI2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

11.08%

-10.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

21.00%

-20.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50%

27.84%

-27.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

26.69%

-26.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.27%

27.38%

-27.11%

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WTI2.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSH.PA vs. WTI2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor WTI2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH.PA and WTI2.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WTI2.DE.

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while WTI2.DE is Technology Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while WTI2.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.40% for WTI2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and WTI2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer