PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH.PA vs. VETA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSH.PA is traded in EUR, while VETA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VETA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than VETA.L's 0.07% return.


CSH.PA

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.98%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
0.92%

VETA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.08%
1Y
-0.02%
3Y*
2.32%
5Y*
-2.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.78%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.65%1.93%-0.51%
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.07%0.27%1.75%6.98%-18.05%-3.90%4.64%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and VETA.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VETA.L
VETA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VETA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VETA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSH.PAVETA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.00

+0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.24

-0.00

+11.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.34

-0.01

+57.35

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the VETA.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and VETA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSH.PAVETA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

-0.00

+3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.28

-0.32

+5.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

-0.08

+0.86

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, smaller than the maximum VETA.L drawdown of -22.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and VETA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH.PAVETA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-22.88%

+19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-3.72%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-4.30%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.77%

-21.72%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.27%

+14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-10.67%

+9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.43%

-1.40%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VETA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH.PAVETA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

1.67%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

3.60%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50%

4.46%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

7.02%

-6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.64%

7.00%

-6.36%

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VETA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSH.PA vs. VETA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor VETA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH.PA and VETA.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VETA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VETA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CSH.PA.

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while VETA.L is European Government Bonds. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while VETA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.07% for VETA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and VETA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer