PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than UBU5.DE's 13.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has underperformed UBU5.DE with an annualized return of 0.66%, while UBU5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


CSH.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
6M
0.94%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
0.66%

UBU5.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
2.15%
YTD
13.37%
6M
13.94%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.87%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.11%-0.70%-0.69%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
13.37%1.27%20.12%5.47%-1.48%38.86%-9.65%28.22%-4.23%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and UBU5.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

UBU5.DE
UBU5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH.PAUBU5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.42

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.93

4.77

+6.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.56

16.51

+39.05

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is higher than the UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and UBU5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum UBU5.DE drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and UBU5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH.PAUBU5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-36.36%

+31.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-4.70%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-19.86%

+19.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.80%

-19.86%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.60%

-36.36%

+32.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-5.90%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.36%

-1.33%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBU5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH.PAUBU5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

2.08%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

6.45%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50%

9.74%

-9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

13.34%

-12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.27%

15.44%

-15.17%

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UBU5.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSH.PA vs. UBU5.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSH.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBU5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.36%2.11%1.74%2.03%1.92%1.52%2.49%1.97%2.53%2.04%2.32%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH.PA and UBU5.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UBU5.DE.

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while UBU5.DE is Large Cap Value Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while UBU5.DE tracks MSCI USA Value. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.20% for UBU5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and UBU5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer