CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE
CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) and SXRW.DE (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while SXRW.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA returned 0.68%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for SXRW.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CSH.PA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SXRW.DE.
Performance
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than SXRW.DE's 11.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has underperformed SXRW.DE with an annualized return of 0.68%, while SXRW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.45% annualized return.
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
SXRW.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 1.05% | 2.25% | 3.69% | 3.22% | -0.11% | -0.70% | -0.69% | -0.61% | -0.55% | -0.45% |
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 11.21% | 20.63% | 13.57% | 10.46% | -1.47% | 24.81% | -15.42% | 25.18% | -10.61% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH.PA and SXRW.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSH.PA
SXRW.DE
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSH.PA | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 1.36 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.77 | 3.03 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.47 | 11.09 | +23.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum SXRW.DE drawdown of -40.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and SXRW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH.PA | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -40.31% | +35.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.35% | -7.91% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.35% | -16.86% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.75% | -16.86% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.57% | -40.31% | +36.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.27% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -5.99% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 2.16% | -2.10% |
Volatility
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.53%, while iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH.PA | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 3.02% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 10.38% | -9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71% | 12.34% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 14.06% | -13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 16.31% | -15.99% |
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRW.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSH.PA vs. SXRW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSH.PA nor SXRW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH.PA and SXRW.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRW.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CSH.PA.
CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while SXRW.DE is Europe Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while SXRW.DE tracks FTSE 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.07% for SXRW.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and SXRW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer