CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE
CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) and 4COP.DE (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while 4COP.DE is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSH.PA returned 2.92%/yr vs 27.63%/yr for 4COP.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSH.PA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for 4COP.DE.
Performance
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than 4COP.DE's 8.23% return.
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 1.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.66%
4COP.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 88.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 0.87% | 2.25% | 3.69% | 3.22% | -0.11% | -0.08% |
4COP.DE Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.23% | 73.65% | 9.36% | 4.93% | 6.75% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH.PA and 4COP.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSH.PA
4COP.DE
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSH.PA | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 1.33 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.93 | 3.38 | +7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 55.56 | 10.14 | +45.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum 4COP.DE drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and 4COP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH.PA | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -39.13% | +34.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | -26.21% | +26.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.18% | -39.13% | +38.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -17.82% | +17.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -14.62% | +13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 8.73% | -8.70% |
Volatility
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) has a volatility of 15.52%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4COP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH.PA | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 15.52% | -15.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.39% | 35.49% | -35.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 41.26% | -40.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 33.44% | -33.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.27% | 33.44% | -33.17% |
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 4COP.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSH.PA vs. 4COP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSH.PA nor 4COP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH.PA and 4COP.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.
CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while 4COP.DE is Copper. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.55% for 4COP.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and 4COP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer