CSEN vs. MLPI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSEN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSEN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

CSEN vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSEN

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 21.57%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEN vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	-0.75%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEN and MLPI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026	0.51

Return for Risk

CSEN vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CSEN vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, smaller than the maximum MLPI drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEN and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSEN	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-5.38%	+0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-0.79%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-1.58%	-1.18%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSEN	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	13.31%	+2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	13.31%	+2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	13.31%	+2.21%

CSEN vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSEN vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

CSEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MLPI's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.33%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSEN and MLPI in my portfolio?

CSEN and MLPI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSEN or MLPI?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSEN or MLPI?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSEN or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.

What is the main difference between CSEN and MLPI?

CSEN is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CSEN and 0.68% for MLPI.