CSEN vs. GXPE
CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. CSEN is actively managed, while GXPE is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSEN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
CSEN vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CSEN
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 22.19%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEN vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | -0.75% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEN and GXPE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSEN vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSEN vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, smaller than the maximum GXPE drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEN and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEN | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -15.73% | +10.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -8.98% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -4.17% | +1.41% |
Volatility
CSEN vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSEN | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 20.81% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 20.81% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 20.81% | -5.29% |
CSEN vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSEN vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
CSEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than GXPE's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | 0.33% | 0.00% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 2.17% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSEN and GXPE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.
GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CSEN and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for CSEN and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer