CSCL vs. NEMG
CSCL (Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CSCL is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSCL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.
Performance
CSCL vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 101.65% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -28.92% return.
CSCL
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 95.60%
- YTD
- 101.65%
- 1Y
- 151.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 124.88%
NEMG
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- -8.31%
- 6M
- -41.24%
- YTD
- -28.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $610.32K | $803.47K | $2.68M | |
| $96.38K | $81.09K | $228.81K |
CSCL vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF | 101.65% | -4.37% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -28.92% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCL and NEMG is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCL vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank
CSCL
NEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSCL vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCL vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, smaller than the maximum NEMG drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.64% | -61.96% | +31.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.60% | -58.41% | +35.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -28.50% | +18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | — | — |
Volatility
CSCL vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.73% | 98.91% | -33.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.17% | 98.91% | -35.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.17% | 98.91% | -35.74% |
CSCL vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCL vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF | 1.26% | 1.31% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCL and NEMG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.
CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.75% for NEMG.
Find the right allocation for CSCL and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer