CSCL vs. LABU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CSCL (Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Over the past year, CSCL returned 168.92% vs 354.66% for LABU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for LABU.

Performance

CSCL vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 122.84% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 84.35% return.

CSCL

• 1D: 5.31%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 140.54%
• YTD: 122.84%
• 1Y: 168.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LABU

• 1D: -9.38%
• 1M: 64.51%
• 6M: 75.19%
• YTD: 84.35%
• 1Y: 354.66%
• 3Y*: 35.47%
• 5Y*: -26.65%
• 10Y*: -7.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCL vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares	122.84%	20.73%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	84.35%	172.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCL and LABU is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.07

CSCL vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSCL	LABU
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	99.7%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CSCL vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCL

CSCL Risk / Return Rank: 87
CSCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CSCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CSCL Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CSCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CSCL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 95
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCL vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSCL	LABU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	4.25	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.67	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.93	10.97	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	30.90	-17.43

CSCL vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCL Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCL and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSCL vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -27.41%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and LABU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSCL	LABU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.41%	-99.18%	+71.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.41%	-30.70%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-78.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.47%	-93.50%	+79.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.33%	-81.77%	+72.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.07%	10.92%	+1.15%

Volatility

CSCL vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) is 20.67%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 23.42%. This indicates that CSCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSCL	LABU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.67%	23.42%	-2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.74%	63.16%	-5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.27%	79.22%	-14.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.26%	96.01%	-32.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.26%	95.21%	-31.95%

CSCL vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSCL vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than LABU's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares	1.14%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.34%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSCL and LABU in my portfolio?

CSCL and LABU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSCL or LABU?

LABU has higher volatility (23.42%) compared to CSCL (20.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCL dropped -27.41% vs LABU's -99.18%.

Which ETF is better, CSCL or LABU?

On 1-year performance, LABU leads with 354.66% vs 168.92% for CSCL. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, CSCL has been the lower-risk option at 20.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSCL or LABU?

Over the 1-year period, LABU has performed better with a 354.66% return vs 168.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSCL or LABU?

LABU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSCL or LABU?

CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.34% for LABU.

What is the main difference between CSCL and LABU?

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.96% for LABU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.