PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCL vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 101.65% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's 10.03% return.


CSCL

1D
4.05%
1M
4.91%
6M
95.60%
YTD
101.65%
1Y
151.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
124.88%

IFED

1D
0.00%
1M
13.92%
6M
14.63%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$610.32K$803.47K$2.68M
$159.79K$83.84K$44.71K

CSCL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSCL and IFED is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSCL
CSCL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CSCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSCL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSCLIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

0.64

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

2.01

+8.67

CSCL vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCL Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCL and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSCL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCLIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.64%

-22.36%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.64%

-20.18%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.60%

-7.61%

-14.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-5.85%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

6.43%

+7.14%

Volatility

CSCL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) is 20.85%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 24.07%. This indicates that CSCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCLIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.85%

24.07%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.85%

27.96%

+30.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.73%

29.34%

+36.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.17%

22.56%

+40.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.17%

22.56%

+40.61%

CSCL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCL and IFED have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (24.07%) compared to CSCL (20.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCL dropped -30.64% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, CSCL leads with 151.43% vs 14.76% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CSCL has been the lower-risk option at 20.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSCL has performed better with a 151.43% return vs 14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.

CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

CSCL tracks Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.45% for IFED.

CSCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCL and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer