PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCL vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 160.53% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.


CSCL

1D
5.31%
1M
84.09%
YTD
160.53%
6M
153.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-1.95%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-56.09%
6M
-50.25%
1Y
-60.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSCL
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares
160.53%20.48%
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
-56.09%-11.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCL and CRMG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCL

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSCL vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCLCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.89

-0.65

+4.55

Drawdowns

CSCL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -27.15%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCLCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.15%

-74.38%

+47.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-67.87%

+67.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-37.81%

+29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.08%

Volatility

CSCL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCLCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.12%

75.31%

-14.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.12%

75.62%

-14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

75.62%

-14.50%

CSCL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.

CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCL and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer