CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE
CSCA.L (iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating)) and ZPRV.DE (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSCA.L is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index, while ZPRV.DE is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L returned 11.72%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for ZPRV.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSCA.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZPRV.DE.
Performance
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSCA.L is traded in GBp, while ZPRV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRV.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCA.L achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRV.DE's 13.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L has underperformed ZPRV.DE with an annualized return of 11.72%, while ZPRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
CSCA.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 34.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
ZPRV.DE
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 38.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 9.66% | 27.37% | 14.01% | 7.76% | -1.83% | 24.99% | 3.07% | 21.81% | -12.31% | 5.15% |
ZPRV.DE SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 13.68% | 8.35% | 9.10% | 16.73% | -0.12% | 37.63% | 3.69% | 20.78% | -10.54% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCA.L and ZPRV.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CSCA.L and ZPRV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSCA.L
ZPRV.DE
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSCA.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.44 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 5.80 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.98 | 18.65 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCA.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 2.49 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.54 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.59 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCA.L and ZPRV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCA.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -43.46% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -6.53% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.18% | -29.61% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.18% | -29.61% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.68% | -43.46% | +9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -7.87% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.04% | -0.33% |
Volatility
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) is 1.69%, while SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that CSCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCA.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 3.38% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 9.35% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 15.23% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 19.85% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 22.00% | -5.00% |
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCA.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCA.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSCA.L nor ZPRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCA.L and ZPRV.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPRV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSCA.L.
CSCA.L is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZPRV.DE is Small Cap Value Equities. CSCA.L tracks MSCI Canada Index, while ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSCA.L and 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSCA.L and ZPRV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer