CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L
CSCA.L (iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating)) and GLCB.L (SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSCA.L is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index, while GLCB.L is a Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Refinitiv Global CB TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L returned 11.39%/yr vs 6.26%/yr for GLCB.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCA.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GLCB.L.
Performance
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCA.L achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than GLCB.L's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L has outperformed GLCB.L with an annualized return of 11.39%, while GLCB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.26% annualized return.
CSCA.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 33.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
GLCB.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 9.07% | 27.37% | 14.01% | 7.76% | -1.83% | 25.85% | 2.37% | 21.81% | -12.31% | 5.15% |
GLCB.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF | 18.03% | 16.97% | 8.82% | 8.16% | -10.86% | -2.14% | 33.15% | 9.84% | -25.44% | 11.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCA.L and GLCB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2014 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSCA.L
GLCB.L
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) and SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (GLCB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCA.L | GLCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.61 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 6.95 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.23 | 22.84 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCA.L drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than GLCB.L's maximum drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCA.L and GLCB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCA.L | GLCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -29.82% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -5.12% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.19% | -8.41% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -19.80% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.68% | -29.82% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -2.25% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -9.81% | -9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.56% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) is 2.99%, while SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (GLCB.L) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that CSCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCA.L | GLCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.80% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 8.72% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 11.11% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 9.97% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 12.97% | +5.66% |
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCA.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCB.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCA.L vs. GLCB.L - Dividend Comparison
CSCA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLCB.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.47% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.35% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCA.L and GLCB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSCA.L is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSCA.L is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GLCB.L.
CSCA.L is categorized as Canada Equities, while GLCB.L is Convertible Bonds. CSCA.L tracks MSCI Canada Index, while GLCB.L tracks Refinitiv Global CB TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSCA.L and 0.50% for GLCB.L.
Find the right allocation for CSCA.L and GLCB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer