PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSAIX vs. GFIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAIX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than GFIRX's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CSAIX has underperformed GFIRX with an annualized return of 0.60%, while GFIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.32% annualized return.


CSAIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
6.10%
6M
8.73%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
0.60%

GFIRX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.43%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.26%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
6.10%-5.84%-5.57%-6.15%21.24%7.46%1.86%-4.39%-4.01%-1.47%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.91%0.54%-5.17%-3.87%20.44%4.86%6.94%2.61%-2.24%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CSAIX and GFIRX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.66

The correlation between CSAIX and GFIRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSAIX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSAIX
CSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GFIRX
GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSAIXGFIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.74

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

12.13

-7.47

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the GFIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAIX and GFIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSAIXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.35

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.32

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.37

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.29

-0.04

Drawdowns

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAIX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than GFIRX's maximum drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAIX and GFIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSAIXGFIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-23.09%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-4.86%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.50%

-22.39%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-23.09%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

-23.09%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.74%

-5.55%

-12.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-7.02%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.49%

+1.29%

Volatility

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) at 2.10%. This indicates that CSAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSAIXGFIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.10%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

6.00%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

7.75%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.47%

10.40%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

9.05%

+1.03%

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSAIX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison

CSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.82%2.27%2.95%0.52%18.80%8.84%0.00%1.74%0.00%0.00%2.64%8.69%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.11%7.35%1.21%7.06%0.16%0.49%0.00%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSAIX and GFIRX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSAIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to GFIRX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSAIX dropped -28.79% vs GFIRX's -23.09%.

GFIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSAIX and GFIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer