CS1.L vs. XDDX.L
CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) and XDDX.L (Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both Europe Equities funds - CS1.L tracks the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR while XDDX.L tracks the FSE DAX TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CS1.L returned 13.85%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for XDDX.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CS1.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDDX.L.
Performance
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CS1.L achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than XDDX.L's 2.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CS1.L has outperformed XDDX.L with an annualized return of 13.85%, while XDDX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.
CS1.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 44.50%
- 3Y*
- 32.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
XDDX.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 12.56% | 62.63% | 14.12% | 24.14% | 4.89% | 0.59% | -7.48% | 8.06% | -11.27% | 15.93% |
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 2.48% | 24.81% | 11.28% | 17.04% | -8.48% | 7.86% | 9.39% | 16.41% | -17.15% | 16.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CS1.L and XDDX.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CS1.L and XDDX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Utilities
CS1.L
XDDX.L
-
Industrials
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Consumer Cyclical
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Technology
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Real Estate
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Energy
CS1.L
XDDX.L
-
Communication Services
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Basic Materials
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Healthcare
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Consumer Defensive
CS1.L
XDDX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
CS1.L
XDDX.L
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CS1.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.12 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 0.69 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.54 | 2.08 | +12.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CS1.L drawdown since its inception was -57.96%, which is greater than XDDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS1.L and XDDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS1.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.96% | -35.15% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -13.08% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -14.36% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -23.84% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | -35.15% | -3.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -2.50% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -7.36% | -9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 4.35% | -1.30% |
Volatility
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CS1.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.79% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 12.17% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 15.19% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 16.97% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 17.97% | +1.35% |
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDDX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CS1.L vs. XDDX.L - Dividend Comparison
CS1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 2.33% | 2.39% | 2.75% | 3.30% | 5.08% | 2.13% | 3.09% | 2.87% | 2.26% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CS1.L and XDDX.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDDX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDDX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.
CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while XDDX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.09% for XDDX.L.
Find the right allocation for CS1.L and XDDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer