PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS1.L vs. XD5E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CS1.L achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than XD5E.L's 7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CS1.L has outperformed XD5E.L with an annualized return of 12.13%, while XD5E.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.


CS1.L

1D
0.91%
1M
3.97%
YTD
6.29%
6M
10.00%
1Y
37.36%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
19.41%
10Y*
12.13%

XD5E.L

1D
0.55%
1M
4.83%
YTD
7.97%
6M
9.54%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
6.29%62.63%14.12%24.14%4.89%0.59%-7.48%8.06%-11.27%15.93%
XD5E.L
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
7.97%30.59%4.80%16.42%-6.55%14.24%5.09%19.28%-11.50%17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CS1.L and XD5E.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2012

0.82

The correlation between CS1.L and XD5E.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CS1.L
XD5E.L

Financial Services

40.3%
25.0%

Utilities

19.0%
6.4%

Industrials

15.8%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.6%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.0%

Technology

3.2%
15.1%

Energy

2.8%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.3%
2.9%

Healthcare

0.7%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
4.6%

Financial Services

CS1.L
40.3%
XD5E.L
25.0%

Utilities

CS1.L
19.0%
XD5E.L
6.4%

Industrials

CS1.L
15.8%
XD5E.L
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CS1.L
10.8%
XD5E.L
8.6%

Real Estate

CS1.L
3.3%
XD5E.L
1.0%

Technology

CS1.L
3.2%
XD5E.L
15.1%

Energy

CS1.L
2.8%
XD5E.L
4.4%

Communication Services

CS1.L
2.4%
XD5E.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

CS1.L
1.3%
XD5E.L
2.9%

Healthcare

CS1.L
0.7%
XD5E.L
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

CS1.L
0.3%
XD5E.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS1.L
CS1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CS1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CS1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XD5E.L
XD5E.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XD5E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS1.LXD5E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.91

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

6.80

+5.34

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CS1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the XD5E.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CS1.L and XD5E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS1.LXD5E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.51

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

0.66

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.66

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CS1.L drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, which is greater than XD5E.L's maximum drawdown of -31.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS1.L and XD5E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS1.LXD5E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-31.47%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-10.99%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.34%

-12.92%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.82%

-21.76%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-31.47%

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.09%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-5.02%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.09%

-0.02%

Volatility

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS1.LXD5E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.62%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

11.52%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

13.90%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.11%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

16.81%

+1.67%

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XD5E.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CS1.L vs. XD5E.L - Dividend Comparison

CS1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XD5E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD5E.L
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
2.42%2.51%2.93%2.71%4.42%1.47%2.89%2.65%1.82%2.41%0.68%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CS1.L and XD5E.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XD5E.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD5E.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.

CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while XD5E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.12% for XD5E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS1.L and XD5E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer