CS1.L vs. PACW.L
CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - CS1.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CS1.L returned 37.36% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CS1.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.
Performance
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CS1.L is traded in GBp, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CS1.L achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.
CS1.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 37.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
PACW.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 6.29% | 42.99% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 11.92% | 9.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CS1.L and PACW.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CS1.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS1.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank
CS1.L
PACW.L
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CS1.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.55 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 4.27 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 17.43 | -5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CS1.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.89 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.24 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CS1.L drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS1.L and PACW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS1.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.87% | -17.68% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -7.06% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.46% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -3.02% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.73% | +1.34% |
Volatility
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that CS1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CS1.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 2.93% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 7.75% | +5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 10.42% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 13.91% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 13.91% | +4.57% |
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CS1.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison
CS1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 0.00% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CS1.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.
CS1.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.
Find the right allocation for CS1.L and PACW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer