PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS.TO vs. SCCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CS.TO is traded in CAD, while SCCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCCO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CS.TO achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 42.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CS.TO has outperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 36.48%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively lower 28.46% annualized return.


CS.TO

1D
-4.39%
1M
40.68%
YTD
10.67%
6M
17.67%
1Y
101.72%
3Y*
36.93%
5Y*
23.31%
10Y*
36.48%

SCCO

1D
-1.97%
1M
22.42%
YTD
42.70%
6M
45.31%
1Y
128.73%
3Y*
49.05%
5Y*
32.85%
10Y*
28.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
10.67%55.01%37.83%30.57%-11.47%134.45%213.16%24.59%-57.64%14.29%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
42.70%58.97%18.85%46.81%11.68%-1.52%56.10%39.38%-27.44%41.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CS.TO and SCCO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.50

The correlation between CS.TO and SCCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CS.TO:

CA$11.70B

SCCO:

$161.54B

EPS

CS.TO:

CA$0.55

SCCO:

$6.04

PE Ratio

CS.TO:

27.70

SCCO:

32.56

PEG Ratio

CS.TO:

0.06

SCCO:

4.49

PS Ratio

CS.TO:

4.72

SCCO:

11.11

PB Ratio

CS.TO:

3.34

SCCO:

13.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

CS.TO:

CA$2.47B

SCCO:

$14.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CS.TO:

CA$812.67M

SCCO:

$6.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CS.TO:

CA$1.30B

SCCO:

$8.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS.TO vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS.TO
CS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCO
SCCO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS.TOSCCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.32

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

13.14

-6.97

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CS.TO and SCCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS.TOSCCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.80

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.89

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.82

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.63

-0.59

Drawdowns

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CS.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than SCCO's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS.TO and SCCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS.TOSCCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-48.16%

-49.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.28%

-29.99%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.05%

-36.86%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.39%

-37.67%

-31.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.23%

-48.16%

-32.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.46%

-7.31%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-16.01%

-43.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.56%

9.84%

+6.72%

Volatility

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 15.14%. This indicates that CS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS.TOSCCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

15.14%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.40%

37.80%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.45%

46.24%

+11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.51%

37.14%

+19.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.60%

34.99%

+23.61%

Dividends

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison

CS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
1.86%2.13%2.29%4.65%5.80%5.19%2.30%4.81%4.55%1.24%0.56%1.30%

Financials

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capstone Copper Corp. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
641.79M
4.25B
(CS.TO) Total Revenue
(SCCO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CS.TO values in CAD, SCCO values in USD

CS.TO vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capstone Copper Corp. and Southern Copper Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
0
Portfolio components
CS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported a gross profit of 227.68M and revenue of 641.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

SCCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported an operating income of 212.02M and revenue of 641.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

SCCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.

CS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported a net income of 100.78M and revenue of 641.79M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.

SCCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CS.TO and SCCO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS.TO and SCCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer