CS.TO vs. SCCO
Compare and contrast key facts about Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO).
Performance
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS.TO Capstone Copper Corp. | -17.85% | 55.01% | 37.83% | 30.57% | -11.47% | 134.45% | 213.16% | 24.59% | -57.64% | 14.29% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 27.22% | 58.97% | 18.85% | 46.81% | 11.68% | -1.52% | 56.10% | 39.38% | -27.44% | 41.18% |
Different Trading Currencies
CS.TO is traded in CAD, while SCCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCCO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CS.TO:
CA$8.67B
SCCO:
$149.16B
CS.TO:
CA$0.41
SCCO:
$5.27
CS.TO:
27.59
SCCO:
33.78
CS.TO:
0.06
SCCO:
4.66
CS.TO:
3.66
SCCO:
10.91
CS.TO:
2.56
SCCO:
13.51
CS.TO:
CA$2.36B
SCCO:
$13.42B
CS.TO:
CA$790.25M
SCCO:
$5.21B
CS.TO:
CA$1.13B
SCCO:
$7.28B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CS.TO achieves a -17.85% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 27.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CS.TO has outperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 36.61%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively lower 26.40% annualized return.
CS.TO
- 1D
- 7.91%
- 1M
- -17.43%
- YTD
- -17.85%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 48.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.61%
SCCO
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -17.37%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 6M
- 48.69%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 40.31%
- 5Y*
- 29.71%
- 10Y*
- 26.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS.TO vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank
CS.TO
SCCO
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CS.TO | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 2.06 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 2.50 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.19 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 11.91 | -8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CS.TO | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.06 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.81 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.77 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.59 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between CS.TO and SCCO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison
CS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS.TO Capstone Copper Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CS.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than SCCO's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS.TO and SCCO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS.TO | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -78.60% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.28% | -30.22% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.39% | -43.07% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.23% | -54.83% | -25.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.05% | -18.69% | -13.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.53% | -22.09% | -37.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.24% | 8.20% | +6.04% |
Volatility
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison
Capstone Copper Corp. (CS.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.35% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 19.04%. This indicates that CS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CS.TO | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.35% | 19.04% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.09% | 36.88% | +8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.89% | 46.84% | +13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.80% | 36.87% | +19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.19% | 34.55% | +24.64% |
Financials
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capstone Copper Corp. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CS.TO vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison
CS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported a gross profit of 232.34M and revenue of 695.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported an operating income of 219.61M and revenue of 695.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.11B and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.
CS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capstone Copper Corp. reported a net income of 51.37M and revenue of 695.49M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.31B and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.