CRXP vs. ZHOG
CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and ZHOG (F/m Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for ZHOG.
Performance
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than ZHOG's 0.83% return.
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHOG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.68% | -0.08% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 0.83% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRXP and ZHOG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRXP vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank
CRXP
ZHOG
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRXP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.62 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum ZHOG drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and ZHOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRXP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -3.66% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.02% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -0.70% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRXP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 1.59% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 4.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 4.01% | -0.08% |
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRXP vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison
CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than ZHOG's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.08% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 5.11% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRXP and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for ZHOG.
ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 2.08% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.43% for ZHOG.
Find the right allocation for CRXP and ZHOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer