CRWU vs. XTAP
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRWU returned -83.81% vs 19.11% for XTAP. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
CRWU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a -45.03% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 12.47% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- -30.53%
- 6M
- -65.39%
- YTD
- -45.03%
- 1Y
- -83.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.28%
XTAP
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.19M | $20.12M | $19.78M | |
| $36.55K | $24.82K | $30.58K |
CRWU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | -45.03% | -77.60% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 12.47% | 4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and XTAP is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
XTAP
CRWU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.92 | -0.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 10.71 | -11.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 54.76 | -55.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -22.13% | -71.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.88% | -1.72% | -92.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.79% | 0.00% | -91.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.42% | -3.36% | -65.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.23% | 0.34% | +71.89% |
Volatility
CRWU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) has a higher volatility of 62.12% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.60%. This indicates that CRWU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.12% | 1.60% | +60.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 138.63% | 4.02% | +134.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 194.05% | 4.93% | +189.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 14.53% | +178.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 14.23% | +178.89% |
CRWU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 15.48% | 8.51% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWU has higher volatility (62.12%) compared to XTAP (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWU dropped -93.88% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 19.11% vs -83.81% for CRWU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 19.11% return vs -83.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 15.48%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer