PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWU vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWU vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 92.52% return.


CRWU

1D
-5.07%
1M
-33.95%
YTD
48.91%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
3.47%
1M
24.82%
YTD
92.52%
6M
104.85%
1Y
292.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWU vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRWU and TSMG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWU vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWU

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWU vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWU vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWUTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

1.76

-2.13

Drawdowns

CRWU vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWUTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-63.67%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.77%

-0.93%

-76.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.57%

-16.94%

-48.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

Volatility

CRWU vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWUTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.93%

71.76%

+120.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.93%

80.99%

+110.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.93%

80.99%

+110.94%

CRWU vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWU vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than TSMG's 5.96% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWU and TSMG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 5.71% for CRWU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for TSMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWU and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer