PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWU vs. NEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWU vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's 0.49% return.


CRWU

1D
-5.07%
1M
-33.95%
YTD
48.91%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEMG

1D
1.47%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
0.49%
6M
19.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWU vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRWU and NEMG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWU vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWU vs. NEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWUNEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.59

-0.96

Drawdowns

CRWU vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -51.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and NEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWUNEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-51.18%

-38.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.77%

-41.20%

-36.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.57%

-20.86%

-44.71%

Volatility

CRWU vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWUNEMGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.93%

99.99%

+91.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.93%

99.99%

+91.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.93%

99.99%

+91.94%

CRWU vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWU vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWU and NEMG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for NEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWU and NEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer