PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWU vs. BEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 562.24% return.


CRWU

1D
-5.07%
1M
-33.95%
YTD
48.91%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BEG

1D
1.53%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
562.24%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRWU and BEG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWU vs. BEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWUBEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

24.84

-25.22

Drawdowns

CRWU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and BEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWUBEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-59.85%

-29.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.77%

-12.58%

-65.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.57%

-16.11%

-49.46%

Volatility

CRWU vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWUBEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.93%

212.92%

-20.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.93%

212.92%

-20.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.93%

212.92%

-20.99%

CRWU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWU and BEG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for BEG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWU and BEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer