CRWU vs. BEG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
CRWU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a -45.03% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 136.78% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- -30.53%
- 6M
- -65.39%
- YTD
- -45.03%
- 1Y
- -83.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.28%
BEG
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -51.76%
- 6M
- -16.69%
- YTD
- 136.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.81M | $15.87M | $11.72M | |
| $23.19M | $20.12M | $19.78M |
CRWU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | -45.03% | -7.93% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 136.78% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and BEG is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRWU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -82.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -82.08% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.79% | -73.06% | -18.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.42% | -23.53% | -44.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.23% | — | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 138.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 194.05% | 229.80% | -35.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 229.80% | -36.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 229.80% | -36.68% |
CRWU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 15.48% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and BEG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 15.48%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer