CRWL vs. NBIG
CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
CRWL vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWL achieves a 96.54% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 262.28% return.
CRWL
- 1D
- -11.43%
- 1M
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 96.73%
- YTD
- 96.54%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -20.38%
- 6M
- 170.02%
- YTD
- 262.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWL vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 96.54% | -24.93% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 262.28% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWL and NBIG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWL vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWL
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRWL vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWL vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.99% | -75.83% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -46.58% | +33.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.36% | -40.38% | +16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.07% | — | — |
Volatility
CRWL vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 202.92% | -110.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.96% | 202.92% | -106.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.96% | 202.92% | -106.96% |
CRWL vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWL vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWL nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWL and NBIG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.
CRWL and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for CRWL and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer