CRWL vs. MYMF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and MYMF (State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MYMF is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRWL returned 66.54% vs 3.00% for MYMF. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MYMF.

Performance

CRWL vs. MYMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWL achieves a 90.19% return, which is significantly higher than MYMF's 0.68% return.

CRWL

• 1D: -8.04%
• 1M: 116.13%
• YTD: 90.19%
• 6M: 56.07%
• 1Y: 66.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MYMF

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 3.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWL vs. MYMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF	90.19%	30.37%	-5.84%
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF	0.68%	3.01%	0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWL and MYMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	-0.00

Return for Risk

CRWL vs. MYMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWL

CRWL Risk / Return Rank: 24
CRWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CRWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CRWL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CRWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CRWL Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MYMF

MYMF Risk / Return Rank: 96
MYMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MYMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MYMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MYMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MYMF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWL vs. MYMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRWL	MYMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	4.01	-3.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	7.08	-5.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	2.22	-1.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	7.90	-6.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.04	29.14	-27.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRWL vs. MYMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the MYMF Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWL and MYMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWL	MYMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	4.01	-3.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.40	-0.63

Drawdowns

CRWL vs. MYMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, which is greater than MYMF's maximum drawdown of -2.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and MYMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWL	MYMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.99%	-2.02%	-62.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.99%	-0.38%	-64.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.13%	0.00%	-16.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.72%	-0.18%	-24.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.71%	0.10%	+32.61%

Volatility

CRWL vs. MYMF - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) has a higher volatility of 32.80% compared to State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) at 0.23%. This indicates that CRWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWL	MYMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.80%	0.23%	+32.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.00%	0.53%	+73.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.85%	0.75%	+89.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.88%	1.65%	+94.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.88%	1.65%	+94.23%

CRWL vs. MYMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MYMF's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWL vs. MYMF - Dividend Comparison

CRWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF	2.47%	2.80%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWL and MYMF in my portfolio?

CRWL and MYMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRWL or MYMF?

CRWL has higher volatility (32.80%) compared to MYMF (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWL dropped -64.99% vs MYMF's -2.02%.

Which ETF is better, CRWL or MYMF?

On 1-year performance, CRWL leads with 66.54% vs 3.00% for MYMF. On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRWL or MYMF?

Over the 1-year period, CRWL has performed better with a 66.54% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWL or MYMF?

MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWL or MYMF?

MYMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for CRWL.

What is the main difference between CRWL and MYMF?

CRWL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MYMF is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 0.20% for MYMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.