CRWD vs. TWLO
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and TWLO (Twilio Inc.) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while TWLO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 25.22%/yr vs -7.54%/yr for TWLO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CRWD vs. TWLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly lower than TWLO's 49.42% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 40.64%
- 3Y*
- 63.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TWLO
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 49.42%
- 6M
- 63.33%
- 1Y
- 74.60%
- 3Y*
- 49.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD vs. TWLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 40.54% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
TWLO Twilio Inc. | 49.42% | 31.61% | 42.45% | 54.96% | -81.41% | -22.20% | 244.42% | -31.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and TWLO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between CRWD and TWLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$169.89B
TWLO:
$33.53B
CRWD:
-$0.02
TWLO:
$0.66
CRWD:
32.89
TWLO:
6.30
CRWD:
36.66
TWLO:
4.31
CRWD:
$5.09B
TWLO:
$5.30B
CRWD:
$3.82B
TWLO:
$2.59B
CRWD:
$246.78M
TWLO:
$304.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. TWLO — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
TWLO
CRWD vs. TWLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWD | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.47 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 5.64 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWD | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.13 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.37 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. TWLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum TWLO drawdown of -90.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and TWLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -90.36% | +22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -30.34% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -45.17% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -89.57% | +21.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -52.08% | +36.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -49.52% | +25.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.18% | 13.27% | +2.91% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. TWLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is 17.60%, while Twilio Inc. (TWLO) has a volatility of 22.30%. This indicates that CRWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.60% | 22.30% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.02% | 43.19% | -6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.06% | 60.55% | -15.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 59.36% | -8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.99% | 60.77% | -4.78% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. TWLO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWD nor TWLO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRWD vs. TWLO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Twilio Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWD vs. TWLO - Profitability Comparison
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
TWLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.24M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
TWLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported an operating income of 107.67M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
TWLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a net income of 90.14M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and TWLO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TWLO has higher volatility (22.30%) compared to CRWD (17.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs TWLO's -90.36%.
TWLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and TWLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer