CRWD vs. TBIL
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while TBIL (US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill 3 Month Index. Over the past 3 years, CRWD returned 70.32%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for TBIL. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 59.49% return, which is significantly higher than TBIL's 1.49% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- 59.32%
- YTD
- 59.49%
- 6M
- 42.63%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 70.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.29%
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 59.49% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -43.63% |
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.19% | 5.15% | 5.12% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and TBIL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
TBIL
CRWD vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWD | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -56.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 17.16 | -15.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 196.84 | -195.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 934.41 | -931.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWD | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 13.78 | -12.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 14.07 | -13.27 |
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and TBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -0.10% | -67.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -0.02% | -37.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -0.02% | -44.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | 0.00% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -0.00% | -23.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 0.00% | +16.14% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 0.08% | +15.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.18% | 0.19% | +35.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.66% | 0.29% | +44.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.73% | 0.32% | +50.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.95% | 0.32% | +55.63% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison
CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 3.82% | 4.07% | 5.02% | 5.00% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and TBIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs TBIL's -0.10%.
TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and TBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer