PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWD vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRWD vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return.


CRWD

1D
-1.82%
1M
24.83%
YTD
40.54%
6M
27.87%
1Y
40.64%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
25.22%
10Y*

META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
40.54%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-14.02%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and META is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.39

The correlation between CRWD and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRWD:

$169.89B

META:

$1.50T

EPS

CRWD:

-$0.02

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

CRWD:

32.89

META:

7.00

PB Ratio

CRWD:

36.66

META:

6.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRWD:

$5.09B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRWD:

$3.82B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRWD:

$246.78M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWD vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRWDMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.94

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

-0.48

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

-1.01

+3.53

CRWD vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWDMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

-0.45

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.28

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.54

+0.20

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWDMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-76.74%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.18%

-33.30%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.44%

-34.15%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.69%

-76.74%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-25.73%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-15.26%

-8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.18%

15.69%

+0.49%

Volatility

CRWD vs. META - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 17.60% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.48%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWDMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.60%

10.48%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.02%

26.95%

+10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.06%

35.56%

+9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.79%

44.05%

+6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.99%

38.69%

+17.30%

Dividends

CRWD vs. META - Dividend Comparison

CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%

Financials

CRWD vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
1.39B
56.31B
(CRWD) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRWD vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

72.0%74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%20222023202420252026
75.3%
81.9%
Portfolio components
CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWD and META have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWD has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to META (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs META's -76.74%.

CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWD and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer