CRWD vs. IBM
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRWD in Software - Infrastructure, IBM in Information Technology Services. Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 25.22%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for IBM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -3.95% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 40.64%
- 3Y*
- 63.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.22%
- 10Y*
- —
IBM
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 22.22%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 6M
- -7.98%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 31.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
CRWD vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 40.54% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -3.95% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and IBM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CRWD and IBM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$169.89B
IBM:
$267.37B
CRWD:
-$0.02
IBM:
$11.32
CRWD:
32.89
IBM:
3.87
CRWD:
36.66
IBM:
8.11
CRWD:
$5.09B
IBM:
$68.91B
CRWD:
$3.82B
IBM:
$40.64B
CRWD:
$246.78M
IBM:
$15.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
IBM
CRWD vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWD | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 0.23 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 0.50 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWD | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.18 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.29 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, roughly equal to the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and IBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -69.40% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -30.96% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -30.96% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -30.96% | -36.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -14.70% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -20.12% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.18% | 14.23% | +1.95% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is 17.60%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 21.84%. This indicates that CRWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.60% | 21.84% | -4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.02% | 34.54% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.06% | 39.53% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 27.15% | +23.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.99% | 26.59% | +29.40% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.40% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
CRWD vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWD vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and IBM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to CRWD (17.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs IBM's -69.40%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and IBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer