CRWD vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Over the past year, CRWD returned 41.74% vs 27.51% for FWRG.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than FWRG.L's 10.64% return.

CRWD

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 21.37%
• YTD: 45.66%
• 6M: 35.27%
• 1Y: 41.74%
• 3Y*: 64.60%
• 5Y*: 24.18%
• 10Y*: —

FWRG.L

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	45.66%	37.00%	34.01%	77.74%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	10.64%	13.84%	20.11%	8,531.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and FWRG.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.30

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 67
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWD	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.58	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	3.59	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.49	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	3.84	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.57	15.15	-12.58

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWD	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-18.87%	-48.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	-7.14%	-30.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.70%	-1.57%	-11.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-2.26%	-21.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.29%	1.81%	+14.48%

Volatility

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.47% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 3.65%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWD	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.47%	3.65%	+14.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.66%	8.11%	+29.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.48%	10.63%	+34.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.78%	4,484.46%	-4,433.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.07%	4,484.46%	-4,428.39%

Dividends

CRWD vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWD nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWD and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

CRWD and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.