CRWD vs. BTCO
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate. Over the past year, CRWD returned 40.64% vs -39.40% for BTCO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. BTCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than BTCO's -27.65% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 40.64%
- 3Y*
- 63.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCO
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- -20.91%
- YTD
- -27.65%
- 6M
- -30.32%
- 1Y
- -39.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD vs. BTCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 40.54% | 37.00% | 20.26% |
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | -27.65% | -6.58% | 100.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and BTCO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. BTCO — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
BTCO
CRWD vs. BTCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWD | BTCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | -0.76 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | -1.36 | +3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWD | BTCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | -0.90 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.27 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. BTCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than BTCO's maximum drawdown of -52.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and BTCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | BTCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -52.05% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -52.05% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -49.60% | +33.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -16.12% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.18% | 28.93% | -12.75% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. BTCO - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 17.60% compared to Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) at 11.78%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | BTCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.60% | 11.78% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.02% | 34.52% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.06% | 44.10% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 49.90% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.99% | 49.90% | +6.09% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. BTCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWD nor BTCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and BTCO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to BTCO (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs BTCO's -52.05%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and BTCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer