CRTC vs. BKCH

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH).

CRTC and BKCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRTC is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. It was launched on Nov 15, 2023. BKCH is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.

Performance

CRTC vs. BKCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRTC vs. BKCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	-2.41%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	-11.32%	27.14%	18.81%	86.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly higher than BKCH's -11.32% return.

CRTC

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -3.00%
• YTD: -2.41%
• 6M: -2.21%
• 1Y: 19.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKCH

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: -11.32%
• 6M: -37.34%
• 1Y: 59.65%
• 3Y*: 42.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. BKCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCH's 0.50% expense ratio.

BKCH

Global X Blockchain ETF

CRTC

Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. BKCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 56
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 40
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. BKCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTC	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	0.83	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.53	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.18	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.17	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	2.44	+4.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTC vs. BKCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the BKCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and BKCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTC	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	0.83	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	-0.09	+1.19

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and BKCH is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRTC vs. BKCH - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BKCH's 2.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.11%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	2.25%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. BKCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum BKCH drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and BKCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	BKCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-91.80%	+72.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-56.28%	+47.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.95%	-57.48%	+51.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-62.89%	+60.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	26.98%	-24.04%

Volatility

CRTC vs. BKCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) is 5.21%, while Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that CRTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	BKCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	19.80%	-14.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	56.49%	-46.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.89%	72.12%	-53.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	75.91%	-59.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.96%	75.91%	-59.95%