PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRTBX vs. MOJOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRTBX
Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund
3.34%9.90%10.21%0.35%-0.25%8.96%16.25%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
17.35%22.91%22.29%19.10%-22.78%28.86%28.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTBX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than MOJOX's 17.35% return.


CRTBX

1D
0.81%
1M
0.00%
YTD
3.34%
6M
6.69%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*

MOJOX

1D
1.81%
1M
1.31%
YTD
17.35%
6M
22.29%
1Y
46.91%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTBX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MOJOX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRTBX vs. MOJOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTBX
CRTBX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MOJOX
MOJOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MOJOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOJOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOJOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MOJOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOJOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRTBXMOJOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.74

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

4.01

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.47

18.14

-5.67

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the MOJOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTBX and MOJOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRTBXMOJOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.70

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.65

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between CRTBX and MOJOX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Dividend Comparison

CRTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, less than MOJOX's 22.86% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRTBX
Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund
8.91%9.21%5.04%1.03%0.13%19.33%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
22.86%26.83%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.49%5.78%4.75%

Drawdowns

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTBX drawdown since its inception was -98.35%, which is greater than MOJOX's maximum drawdown of -28.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTBX and MOJOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRTBXMOJOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.35%

-28.85%

-69.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

-8.15%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.35%

-25.32%

-73.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.00%

-3.09%

-94.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.18%

-7.97%

-15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.70%

-1.30%

Volatility

CRTBX vs. MOJOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) is 3.18%, while Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that CRTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOJOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRTBXMOJOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

8.83%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

16.34%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.99%

22.41%

-12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2,492.22%

17.30%

+2,474.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,323.69%

15.98%

+2,307.71%