PortfoliosLab logo
CRTBX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRTBX and CRDBX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.29%
40.09%
CRTBX
CRDBX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRTBX:

0.16

CRDBX:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

CRTBX:

0.32

CRDBX:

0.43

Omega Ratio

CRTBX:

1.05

CRDBX:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

CRTBX:

0.10

CRDBX:

0.15

Martin Ratio

CRTBX:

0.58

CRDBX:

0.46

Ulcer Index

CRTBX:

3.77%

CRDBX:

9.58%

Daily Std Dev

CRTBX:

13.29%

CRDBX:

26.80%

Max Drawdown

CRTBX:

-26.62%

CRDBX:

-42.59%

Current Drawdown

CRTBX:

-15.36%

CRDBX:

-17.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTBX achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 4.44% return.


CRTBX

YTD

-1.40%

1M

2.03%

6M

3.30%

1Y

2.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CRDBX

YTD

4.44%

1M

11.89%

6M

12.24%

1Y

4.37%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTBX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CRTBX: current value is 1.58%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CRTBX: 1.58%
Expense ratio chart for CRDBX: current value is 1.24%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CRDBX: 1.24%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRTBX vs. CRDBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRTBX is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRDBX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRTBX, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CRTBX: 0.16
CRDBX: 0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRTBX, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CRTBX: 0.32
CRDBX: 0.43
The chart of Omega ratio for CRTBX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
CRTBX: 1.05
CRDBX: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRTBX, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
CRTBX: 0.10
CRDBX: 0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for CRTBX, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
CRTBX: 0.58
CRDBX: 0.46

The current CRTBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is comparable to the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTBX and CRDBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.16
0.16
CRTBX
CRDBX

Dividends

CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

CRTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than CRDBX's 1.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
CRTBX
Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund
1.34%1.32%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.19%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
1.03%1.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTBX drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -42.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTBX and CRDBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-15.36%
-17.25%
CRTBX
CRDBX

Volatility

CRTBX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) is 5.40%, while Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 15.98%. This indicates that CRTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.40%
15.98%
CRTBX
CRDBX