PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.80%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%16.13%2.73%47.58%-15.83%1.42%
VRE
Veris Residential, Inc.
29.17%-12.83%16.70%-2.82%-7.15%46.18%-45.10%16.54%2.67%-28.56%
Different Trading Currencies

CRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while VRE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRT-UN.TO:

CA$2.83B

VRE:

$1.93B

EPS

CRT-UN.TO:

CA$1.52

VRE:

$0.77

PE Ratio

CRT-UN.TO:

11.18

VRE:

24.49

PEG Ratio

CRT-UN.TO:

0.21

VRE:

0.05

PS Ratio

CRT-UN.TO:

6.50

VRE:

6.70

PB Ratio

CRT-UN.TO:

1.43

VRE:

1.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRT-UN.TO:

CA$604.25M

VRE:

$288.43M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRT-UN.TO:

CA$471.69M

VRE:

$250.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRT-UN.TO:

CA$612.14M

VRE:

$212.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT-UN.TO achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than VRE's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT-UN.TO has outperformed VRE with an annualized return of 7.36%, while VRE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.57% annualized return.


CRT-UN.TO

1D
2.60%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
5.80%
6M
7.09%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
7.36%

VRE

1D
0.02%
1M
2.33%
YTD
29.17%
6M
26.60%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
0.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VRE
VRE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRT-UN.TOVREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

0.39

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

0.80

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

0.46

+3.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.76

0.75

+9.01

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the VRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT-UN.TO and VRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRT-UN.TOVREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.39

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.24

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.02

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.10

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and VRE is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Dividend Comparison

CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than VRE's 1.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.56%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.09%4.70%6.37%4.82%4.57%5.09%
VRE
Veris Residential, Inc.
1.69%2.15%1.58%0.65%0.00%0.00%4.82%3.46%4.08%3.25%2.07%2.57%

Drawdowns

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, smaller than the maximum VRE drawdown of -60.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and VRE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRT-UN.TOVREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.88%

-71.48%

+25.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-19.27%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-47.25%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

-60.02%

+14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-30.46%

+28.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-25.38%

+19.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

11.21%

-8.75%

Volatility

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Volatility Comparison

CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) at 1.27%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRT-UN.TOVREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

1.27%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

18.15%

-8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

26.61%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

29.22%

-11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

31.31%

-11.01%

Financials

CRT-UN.TO vs. VRE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CT Real Estate Investment Trust and Veris Residential, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
152.92M
71.31M
(CRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(VRE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CRT-UN.TO values in CAD, VRE values in USD