PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRQ.NEO vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRQ.NEO
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF
6.94%31.87%22.17%9.76%0.89%33.95%-2.73%19.66%-10.18%6.98%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
7.12%133.44%31.28%-3.27%9.67%-13.25%44.81%9.23%-1.49%-0.91%
Different Trading Currencies

CRQ.NEO is traded in CAD, while SLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRQ.NEO having a 6.94% return and SLV slightly higher at 7.20%. Over the past 10 years, CRQ.NEO has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 13.47%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.65% annualized return.


CRQ.NEO

1D
0.18%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
6.94%
6M
15.10%
1Y
37.92%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.47%

SLV

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.03%
YTD
7.20%
6M
58.48%
1Y
116.32%
3Y*
46.89%
5Y*
26.68%
10Y*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRQ.NEO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRQ.NEO
CRQ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CRQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRQ.NEOSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

2.10

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.04

2.20

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.40

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.73

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.73

8.27

+10.46

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRQ.NEO and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRQ.NEOSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.10

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

0.80

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.60

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.39

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between CRQ.NEO and SLV is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

CRQ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRQ.NEO
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF
2.05%2.18%2.72%2.97%2.90%2.17%2.98%2.71%2.46%1.91%1.89%3.09%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -63.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQ.NEO and SLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRQ.NEOSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-76.28%

+34.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-42.45%

+32.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-42.45%

+26.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.75%

-42.81%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-35.47%

+32.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-44.76%

+39.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

13.77%

-11.66%

Volatility

CRQ.NEO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) is 4.62%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that CRQ.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRQ.NEOSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

16.59%

-11.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

55.92%

-47.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

55.75%

-43.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

33.39%

-20.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

29.66%

-13.33%