CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CRQ.NEO (iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF) and HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. CRQ.NEO is passively managed, while HAL.TO is actively managed. CRQ.NEO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for HAL.TO.

Performance

CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRQ.NEO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAL.TO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 18.22%
• 6M: 20.88%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: 11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL.TO

HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRQ.NEO	HAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.80	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CRQ.NEO	HAL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-39.70%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.19%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRQ.NEO	HAL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.55%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.36%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.85%	—

CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRQ.NEO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HAL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRQ.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

CRQ.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF	1.95%	2.37%	2.79%	3.60%	4.84%	2.99%	3.56%	2.96%	3.43%	3.17%	2.84%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CRQ.NEO or HAL.TO?

On fees, HAL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRQ.NEO or HAL.TO?

HAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.

What is the main difference between CRQ.NEO and HAL.TO?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for CRQ.NEO and 0.67% for HAL.TO.