CRPS.L vs. GLD
CRPS.L (iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CRPS.L is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRPS.L returned 2.45%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for GLD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRPS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRPS.L is traded in GBP, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPS.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CRPS.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 2.45%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.
CRPS.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 1.48%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.81%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | -1.84% | 0.38% | 2.69% | 2.88% | -5.90% | -2.68% | 6.79% | 8.38% | 1.64% | -0.97% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 4.20% | 52.02% | 28.87% | 7.06% | 11.03% | -3.24% | 21.15% | 13.37% | 3.87% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPS.L and GLD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2012 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRPS.L and GLD has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRPS.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
CRPS.L
GLD
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRPS.L | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 1.95 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 4.77 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRPS.L | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.37 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 1.18 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.87 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.70 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPS.L and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPS.L | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -41.89% | +26.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -17.78% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.77% | -17.78% | +12.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.26% | -17.78% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.38% | -22.78% | +7.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -16.16% | +8.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -13.21% | +7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 7.24% | -4.94% |
Volatility
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) is 1.35%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that CRPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRPS.L | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 3.81% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 21.73% | -17.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 25.28% | -19.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.17% | 16.70% | -9.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 16.22% | -7.73% |
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRPS.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRPS.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 2.08% | 3.87% | 3.34% | 2.55% | 2.07% | 2.42% | 2.75% | 2.56% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.58% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRPS.L and GLD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRPS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRPS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
CRPS.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while GLD is Gold. CRPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRPS.L and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for CRPS.L and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer