PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMX vs. BRKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMX vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRMX

1D
-3.47%
1M
-69.76%
6M
-92.41%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BRKL

1D
0.85%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$853.16$14.75K$14.75K
$770.98K$704.08K$3.40M

CRMX vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRMX and BRKL is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMX vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMX vs. BRKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRMX vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and BRKL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMXBRKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-7.03%

-90.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.14%

-0.13%

-97.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.04%

-4.14%

-75.90%

Volatility

CRMX vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMXBRKLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

262.41%

30.99%

+231.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

262.41%

30.99%

+231.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

262.41%

30.99%

+231.42%

CRMX vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMX vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMX nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMX and BRKL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.

CRMX and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 0.45% for BRKL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMX and BRKL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer