PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMVX vs. EVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMVX vs. EVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMVX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than EVG's 1.12% return.


CRMVX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*

EVG

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.12%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMVX vs. EVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRMVX
Potomac Managed Volatility Fund
1.81%4.91%1.22%0.25%4.76%0.61%3.98%
EVG
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund
1.12%8.43%14.80%11.90%-14.12%17.10%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMVX and EVG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020

0.15

The correlation between CRMVX and EVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMVX vs. EVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMVX
CRMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CRMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EVG
EVG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMVX vs. EVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMVXEVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

1.43

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

4.19

+11.10

CRMVX vs. EVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the EVG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMVX and EVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMVXEVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.84

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.43

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.34

-0.34

Drawdowns

CRMVX vs. EVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMVX drawdown since its inception was -97.39%, which is greater than EVG's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMVX and EVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMVXEVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.39%

-40.60%

-56.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-5.03%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.39%

-8.24%

-89.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

-23.35%

-74.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.11%

-2.24%

-94.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-6.23%

-18.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

1.71%

-1.19%

Volatility

CRMVX vs. EVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) is 1.34%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that CRMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMVXEVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

3.47%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

6.64%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

8.58%

-4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,597.76%

12.26%

+1,585.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,468.01%

12.99%

+1,455.02%

CRMVX vs. EVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMVX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than EVG's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMVX vs. EVG - Dividend Comparison

CRMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than EVG's 8.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMVX
Potomac Managed Volatility Fund
5.65%5.75%3.75%2.74%0.57%2.59%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EVG
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund
8.38%8.15%8.69%9.18%12.40%8.75%6.67%6.96%6.63%6.68%7.79%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMVX and EVG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVG has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to CRMVX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMVX dropped -97.39% vs EVG's -40.60%.

CRMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMVX and EVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer