EVG vs. MMT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EVG (Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund) and MMT (MFS Multimarket Income Trust) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EVG returned 6.03%/yr vs 5.91%/yr for MMT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVG charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for MMT.

Performance

EVG vs. MMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) and MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVG achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than MMT's 0.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EVG having a 6.03% annualized return and MMT not far behind at 5.91%.

EVG

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 6.03%

MMT

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: 6.20%
• 3Y*: 9.33%
• 5Y*: 2.01%
• 10Y*: 5.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVG vs. MMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund	2.11%	8.43%	14.80%	11.90%	-14.12%	17.10%	-1.68%	16.48%	-7.59%	10.82%
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	0.86%	8.10%	12.40%	10.14%	-22.96%	13.11%	8.88%	30.32%	-7.70%	9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EVG and MMT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2005	0.31

Return for Risk

EVG vs. MMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVG

EVG Risk / Return Rank: 15
EVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
EVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EVG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
EVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
EVG Martin Ratio Rank: 17

MMT

MMT Risk / Return Rank: 10
MMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MMT Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
MMT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVG vs. MMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) and MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVG	MMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.70	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.07	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	1.14	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.29	2.88	+1.41

EVG vs. MMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the MMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVG and MMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVG vs. MMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVG drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than MMT's maximum drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVG and MMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVG	MMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.60%	-35.70%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-5.43%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.24%	-8.23%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-32.29%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.75%	-35.70%	+2.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-2.79%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-5.25%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	2.15%	-0.40%

Volatility

EVG vs. MMT - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) at 2.48%. This indicates that EVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVG	MMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	2.48%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.59%	6.93%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.60%	8.97%	-0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.27%	11.62%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	14.30%	-1.30%

EVG vs. MMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVG has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MMT's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EVG vs. MMT - Dividend Comparison

EVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, less than MMT's 8.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund	8.36%	8.15%	8.69%	9.18%	12.40%	8.75%	6.67%	6.96%	6.63%	6.68%	7.79%	8.05%
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	8.96%	8.65%	8.65%	8.65%	9.38%	7.86%	8.07%	8.16%	9.86%	8.83%	8.71%	9.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVG and MMT in my portfolio?

EVG and MMT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVG or MMT?

EVG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to MMT (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVG dropped -40.60% vs MMT's -35.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.