CRMU vs. ADBG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. CRMU is passively managed, while ADBG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CRMU vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMU

• 1D: -12.68%
• 1M: -38.92%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ADBG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 17.67%
• 6M: -61.76%
• YTD: -65.46%
• 1Y: -70.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMU vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-76.87%
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and ADBG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	-0.08

Return for Risk

CRMU vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMU vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMU	ADBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.78	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.59	—

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and ADBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMU	ADBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.87%	-84.14%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-78.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.87%	-79.03%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.08%	-44.45%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMU	ADBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	28.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	60.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	235.19%	70.42%	+164.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	235.19%	68.94%	+166.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	235.19%	68.94%	+166.25%

CRMU vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRMU and ADBG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CRMU vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMU nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMU and ADBG in my portfolio?

CRMU and ADBG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMU or ADBG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMU or ADBG?

CRMU and ADBG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMU or ADBG?

CRMU and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.