PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMSX vs. WEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMSX achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CRMSX has underperformed WEMMX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while WEMMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


CRMSX

1D
-1.48%
1M
4.88%
YTD
14.32%
6M
14.23%
1Y
29.60%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.71%

WEMMX

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.21%
YTD
19.72%
6M
21.85%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
14.32%2.61%17.86%9.71%-6.05%16.50%-3.28%25.82%-15.48%14.13%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
19.72%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMSX and WEMMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 1998

0.85

The correlation between CRMSX and WEMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMSX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMSX
CRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMSXWEMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.90

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

12.00

-4.53

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the WEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMSX and WEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMSXWEMMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.06

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.28

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.45

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Drawdowns

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than WEMMX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMSX and WEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMSXWEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-42.48%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-9.31%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-21.44%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-27.11%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.66%

-41.73%

-5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.21%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-6.62%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.02%

+0.86%

Volatility

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison

CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) at 5.25%. This indicates that CRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMSXWEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.25%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

12.48%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

17.67%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

18.93%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

20.45%

+2.35%

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMSX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMSX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison

CRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, less than WEMMX's 19.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
9.37%10.71%10.29%4.44%16.87%12.53%0.46%7.17%12.30%16.69%7.54%23.38%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
19.05%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CRMSX and WEMMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CRMSX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to WEMMX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMSX dropped -55.09% vs WEMMX's -42.48%.

WEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMSX and WEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer