CRMG vs. VOLT
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -59.31% vs 38.01% for VOLT. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
CRMG vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -60.18% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 28.30% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 19.47%
- 6M
- -36.29%
- YTD
- -60.18%
- 1Y
- -59.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -50.26%
VOLT
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- YTD
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 38.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.47M | $25.73M | $19.66M | |
| $11.21M | $11.77M | $15.67M |
CRMG vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -60.18% | -0.29% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 28.30% | 39.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and VOLT is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.13 |
The correlation between CRMG and VOLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
VOLT
CRMG vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.26 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.14 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 8.15 | -9.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and VOLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -23.40% | -56.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.15% | -17.22% | -55.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.86% | -11.75% | -59.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -5.34% | -36.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.96% | 4.50% | +39.46% |
Volatility
CRMG vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a higher volatility of 28.63% compared to Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) at 9.95%. This indicates that CRMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.63% | 9.95% | +18.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.59% | 21.11% | +45.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.64% | 24.43% | +57.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.54% | 25.46% | +52.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.54% | 25.46% | +52.08% |
CRMG vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CRMG and VOLT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
CRMG vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison
CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and VOLT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRMG has higher volatility (28.63%) compared to VOLT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -79.83% vs VOLT's -23.40%.
On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 38.01% vs -59.31% for CRMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 38.01% return vs -59.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRMG and VOLT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.
CRMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tema.
VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and VOLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer