CRMG vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

CRMG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSD

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-13.26%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	19.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and NTSD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	-0.08

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	5.46	-6.11

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and NTSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-5.20%	-69.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.87%	-0.04%	-67.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.81%	-0.83%	-36.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.31%	24.10%	+51.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.62%	24.10%	+51.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.62%	24.10%	+51.52%

CRMG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and NTSD in my portfolio?

CRMG and NTSD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or NTSD?

CRMG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMG and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 0.35% for NTSD.