CRMG vs. KJD
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.
Performance
CRMG vs. KJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -57.62% return, which is significantly lower than KJD's -1.83% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -56.45%
- 1Y
- -62.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJD
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- -13.53%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -10.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -57.62% | 19.53% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | -1.83% | -27.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and KJD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. KJD — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
KJD
CRMG vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMG | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMG | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.67 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. KJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than KJD's maximum drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and KJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.38% | -49.17% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.99% | -34.44% | -34.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.92% | -28.69% | -9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.28% | — | — |
Volatility
CRMG vs. KJD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.38% | 62.59% | +12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 62.59% | +12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 62.59% | +12.96% |
CRMG vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMG vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMG nor KJD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and KJD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
CRMG and KJD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.26% for KJD.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and KJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer